“Live simply so that others can simply live.”
This is probably the most thought provoking statement I’ve heard this term, at least for Business Ethics. Business Ethics sounds like a normal subject in graduate school, I’ve actually taken up the same subject during college but if you will think about it more deeply, it is truly an oxymoron. Business contradicts ethics in one way or another. Business is all about making profits while ethics is how we ought to live. I am not saying that it is impossible to make profits in an ethical way but it definitely is a very difficult task. When your goal is to make profits, you have to maximize your sales through various measures the most common of which is to do aggressive advertising. Most businesses are not contented even if they have the major share in the market, their goal is to be the only one in the market, isn’t that being greedy? How will ethics play a role in situations like this? How the concepts of business and ethics clash is a big issue, like laying off employees to cut costs and maximize profits, selling of products which are clearly harmful to our health like cigarettes, the list goes on. So let me just tackle one business ethics issue in this article.
The Philippines is blessed with agricultural lands, most provinces do farming as a main source of livelihood but as time goes by, agricultural lands are slowly turned into subdivisions, resorts, golf courses, malls, etc. In a country where industrialization is viewed as the only way to progress, this is a big issue. How many malls, resorts, golf courses and buildings do we all need? Did we even think of those farmers who simply wants to plow the fields and earn a living to give their families a decent life? Those capitalists who has the funding to build all those malls, resorts and golf courses can live their lives decently but it is the wanting to have more that fuels them to widen their ventures and rake in more profits while indirectly robbing the farmers the means to be a farmer.
Live simply, so that others can simply live. Yes, I am guilty as well. I love resorts and malls. I must admit that I love the city life, the urbanized lifestyle, that is why I was also struck by my professor’s statement. I am not saying that we should stop modernization what I just want to impart with you is to strike the balance between modernization and progress as against agriculture. We can live without going to the resort but can we survive with no rice or vegetable on our plates? It is simple but it is indeed a big issue. Maybe you can’t blame a business man for putting up a mall in a place wherein the population in proportion with purchasing power is increasing but how about the workers of the hacienderos who are earning a living through those agricultural lands that they will eventually convert? How about investing more on agriculture? Isn’t it profitable as well?
Business vis a vis ethics, its difficult to strike the balance between the two but I still believe we can do it. The issue I just opened up is just one of the many. It is actually inspired by the case of the Sumilao farmers. The case brought up a lot of realizations in me like a cup of my early morning coffee at Starbucks is more expensive than the wage of a farmer who works at a minimum of 8 hours a day under the scorching heat of the sun and yet here I am, complaining at times.